Advertisement
Advertisement

## How to implement a queue using two stacks?

### Question

Suppose we have two stacks and no other temporary variable.

Is to possible to "construct" a queue data structure using only the two stacks?

2016/08/23
1
402
8/23/2016 12:59:36 AM

## A - How To Reverse A Stack

To understand how to construct a queue using two stacks, you should understand how to reverse a stack crystal clear. Remember how stack works, it is very similar to the dish stack on your kitchen. The last washed dish will be on the top of the clean stack, which is called as Last In First Out (LIFO) in computer science.

Lets imagine our stack like a bottle as below; If we push integers 1,2,3 respectively, then 3 will be on the top of the stack. Because 1 will be pushed first, then 2 will be put on the top of 1. Lastly, 3 will be put on the top of the stack and latest state of our stack represented as a bottle will be as below; Now we have our stack represented as a bottle is populated with values 3,2,1. And we want to reverse the stack so that the top element of the stack will be 1 and bottom element of the stack will be 3. What we can do ? We can take the bottle and hold it upside down so that all the values should reverse in order ? Yes we can do that, but that's a bottle. To do the same process, we need to have a second stack that which is going to store the first stack elements in reverse order. Let's put our populated stack to the left and our new empty stack to the right. To reverse the order of the elements, we are going to pop each element from left stack, and push them to the right stack. You can see what happens as we do so on the image below; So we know how to reverse a stack.

## B - Using Two Stacks As A Queue

On previous part, I've explained how can we reverse the order of stack elements. This was important, because if we push and pop elements to the stack, the output will be exactly in reverse order of a queue. Thinking on an example, let's push the array of integers `{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}` to a stack. If we pop the elements and print them until the stack is empty, we will get the array in the reverse order of pushing order, which will be `{5, 4, 3, 2, 1}` Remember that for the same input, if we dequeue the queue until the queue is empty, the output will be `{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}`. So it is obvious that for the same input order of elements, output of the queue is exactly reverse of the output of a stack. As we know how to reverse a stack using an extra stack, we can construct a queue using two stacks.

Our queue model will consist of two stacks. One stack will be used for `enqueue` operation (stack #1 on the left, will be called as Input Stack), another stack will be used for the `dequeue` operation (stack #2 on the right, will be called as Output Stack). Check out the image below; Our pseudo-code is as below;

### Enqueue Operation

``````Push every input element to the Input Stack
``````

### Dequeue Operation

``````If ( Output Stack is Empty)
pop every element in the Input Stack
and push them to the Output Stack until Input Stack is Empty

pop from Output Stack
``````

Let's enqueue the integers `{1, 2, 3}` respectively. Integers will be pushed on the Input Stack (Stack #1) which is located on the left; Then what will happen if we execute a dequeue operation? Whenever a dequeue operation is executed, queue is going to check if the Output Stack is empty or not(see the pseudo-code above) If the Output Stack is empty, then the Input Stack is going to be extracted on the output so the elements of Input Stack will be reversed. Before returning a value, the state of the queue will be as below; Check out the order of elements in the Output Stack (Stack #2). It's obvious that we can pop the elements from the Output Stack so that the output will be same as if we dequeued from a queue. Thus, if we execute two dequeue operations, first we will get `{1, 2}` respectively. Then element 3 will be the only element of the Output Stack, and the Input Stack will be empty. If we enqueue the elements 4 and 5, then the state of the queue will be as follows; Now the Output Stack is not empty, and if we execute a dequeue operation, only 3 will be popped out from the Output Stack. Then the state will be seen as below; Again, if we execute two more dequeue operations, on the first dequeue operation, queue will check if the Output Stack is empty, which is true. Then pop out the elements of the Input Stack and push them to the Output Stack unti the Input Stack is empty, then the state of the Queue will be as below; Easy to see, the output of the two dequeue operations will be `{4, 5}`

## C - Implementation Of Queue Constructed with Two Stacks

Here is an implementation in Java. I'm not going to use the existing implementation of Stack so the example here is going to reinvent the wheel;

## C - 1) MyStack class : A Simple Stack Implementation

``````public class MyStack<T> {

// inner generic Node class
private class Node<T> {
T data;
Node<T> next;

public Node(T data) {
this.data = data;
}
}

private Node<T> head;
private int size;

public void push(T e) {
Node<T> newElem = new Node(e);

if(head == null) {
head = newElem;
} else {
newElem.next = head;
head = newElem;     // new elem on the top of the stack
}

size++;
}

public T pop() {
if(head == null)
return null;

T elem = head.data;
head = head.next;   // top of the stack is head.next

size--;

return elem;
}

public int size() {
return size;
}

public boolean isEmpty() {
return size == 0;
}

public void printStack() {
System.out.print("Stack: ");

if(size == 0)
System.out.print("Empty !");
else
for(Node<T> temp = head; temp != null; temp = temp.next)
System.out.printf("%s ", temp.data);

System.out.printf("\n");
}
}
``````

## C - 2) MyQueue class : Queue Implementation Using Two Stacks

``````public class MyQueue<T> {

private MyStack<T> inputStack;      // for enqueue
private MyStack<T> outputStack;     // for dequeue
private int size;

public MyQueue() {
inputStack = new MyStack<>();
outputStack = new MyStack<>();
}

public void enqueue(T e) {
inputStack.push(e);
size++;
}

public T dequeue() {
// fill out all the Input if output stack is empty
if(outputStack.isEmpty())
while(!inputStack.isEmpty())
outputStack.push(inputStack.pop());

T temp = null;
if(!outputStack.isEmpty()) {
temp = outputStack.pop();
size--;
}

return temp;
}

public int size() {
return size;
}

public boolean isEmpty() {
return size == 0;
}

}
``````

## C - 3) Demo Code

``````public class TestMyQueue {

public static void main(String[] args) {
MyQueue<Integer> queue = new MyQueue<>();

// enqueue integers 1..3
for(int i = 1; i <= 3; i++)
queue.enqueue(i);

// execute 2 dequeue operations
for(int i = 0; i < 2; i++)
System.out.println("Dequeued: " + queue.dequeue());

// enqueue integers 4..5
for(int i = 4; i <= 5; i++)
queue.enqueue(i);

// dequeue the rest
while(!queue.isEmpty())
System.out.println("Dequeued: " + queue.dequeue());
}

}
``````

## C - 4) Sample Output

``````Dequeued: 1
Dequeued: 2
Dequeued: 3
Dequeued: 4
Dequeued: 5
``````
2016/08/23

You can even simulate a queue using only one stack. The second (temporary) stack can be simulated by the call stack of recursive calls to the insert method.

The principle stays the same when inserting a new element into the queue:

• You need to transfer elements from one stack to another temporary stack, to reverse their order.
• Then push the new element to be inserted, onto the temporary stack
• Then transfer the elements back to the original stack
• The new element will be on the bottom of the stack, and the oldest element is on top (first to be popped)

A Queue class using only one Stack, would be as follows:

``````public class SimulatedQueue<E> {
private java.util.Stack<E> stack = new java.util.Stack<E>();

public void insert(E elem) {
if (!stack.empty()) {
E topElem = stack.pop();
insert(elem);
stack.push(topElem);
}
else
stack.push(elem);
}

public E remove() {
return stack.pop();
}
}
``````
2008/09/16

The time complexities would be worse, though. A good queue implementation does everything in constant time.

Edit

Not sure why my answer has been downvoted here. If we program, we care about time complexity, and using two standard stacks to make a queue is inefficient. It's a very valid and relevant point. If someone else feels the need to downvote this more, I would be interested to know why.

A little more detail: on why using two stacks is worse than just a queue: if you use two stacks, and someone calls dequeue while the outbox is empty, you need linear time to get to the bottom of the inbox (as you can see in Dave's code).

You can implement a queue as a singly-linked list (each element points to the next-inserted element), keeping an extra pointer to the last-inserted element for pushes (or making it a cyclic list). Implementing queue and dequeue on this data structure is very easy to do in constant time. That's worst-case constant time, not amortized. And, as the comments seem to ask for this clarification, worst-case constant time is strictly better than amortized constant time.

2011/04/07

Let queue to be implemented be q and stacks used to implement q be stack1 and stack2.

q can be implemented in two ways:

Method 1 (By making enQueue operation costly)

This method makes sure that newly entered element is always at the top of stack 1, so that deQueue operation just pops from stack1. To put the element at top of stack1, stack2 is used.

``````enQueue(q, x)
1) While stack1 is not empty, push everything from stack1 to stack2.
2) Push x to stack1 (assuming size of stacks is unlimited).
3) Push everything back to stack1.
deQueue(q)
1) If stack1 is empty then error
2) Pop an item from stack1 and return it.
``````

Method 2 (By making deQueue operation costly)

In this method, in en-queue operation, the new element is entered at the top of stack1. In de-queue operation, if stack2 is empty then all the elements are moved to stack2 and finally top of stack2 is returned.

``````enQueue(q,  x)
1) Push x to stack1 (assuming size of stacks is unlimited).

deQueue(q)
1) If both stacks are empty then error.
2) If stack2 is empty
While stack1 is not empty, push everything from stack1 to stack2.
3) Pop the element from stack2 and return it.
``````

Method 2 is definitely better than method 1. Method 1 moves all the elements twice in enQueue operation, while method 2 (in deQueue operation) moves the elements once and moves elements only if stack2 empty.

2014/04/13

A solution in c#

``````public class Queue<T> where T : class
{
private Stack<T> input = new Stack<T>();
private Stack<T> output = new Stack<T>();
public void Enqueue(T t)
{
input.Push(t);
}

public T Dequeue()
{
if (output.Count == 0)
{
while (input.Count != 0)
{
output.Push(input.Pop());
}
}

return output.Pop();
}
}
``````
2019/12/27

Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with: Stack Overflow
Email: [email protected]