Initialization of an ArrayList in one line


I wanted to create a list of options for testing purposes. At first, I did this:

ArrayList<String> places = new ArrayList<String>();
places.add("Buenos Aires");
places.add("La Plata");

Then, I refactored the code as follows:

ArrayList<String> places = new ArrayList<String>(
    Arrays.asList("Buenos Aires", "Córdoba", "La Plata"));

Is there a better way to do this?

11/21/2019 9:48:28 AM

Accepted Answer

Actually, probably the "best" way to initialize the ArrayList is the method you wrote, as it does not need to create a new List in any way:

ArrayList<String> list = new ArrayList<String>();

The catch is that there is quite a bit of typing required to refer to that list instance.

There are alternatives, such as making an anonymous inner class with an instance initializer (also known as an "double brace initialization"):

ArrayList<String> list = new ArrayList<String>() {{

However, I'm not too fond of that method because what you end up with is a subclass of ArrayList which has an instance initializer, and that class is created just to create one object -- that just seems like a little bit overkill to me.

What would have been nice was if the Collection Literals proposal for Project Coin was accepted (it was slated to be introduced in Java 7, but it's not likely to be part of Java 8 either.):

List<String> list = ["A", "B", "C"];

Unfortunately it won't help you here, as it will initialize an immutable List rather than an ArrayList, and furthermore, it's not available yet, if it ever will be.

3/13/2015 3:27:35 PM

The simple answer

In Java 9 or later, after List.of() was added:

List<String> strings = List.of("foo", "bar", "baz");

With Java 10 or later, this can be shortened with the var keyword.

var strings = List.of("foo", "bar", "baz");

This will give you an immutable List, so it cannot be changed.
Which is what you want in most cases where you're prepopulating it.

Java 8 or earlier:

List<String> strings = Arrays.asList("foo", "bar", "baz");

This will give you a List backed by an array, so it cannot change length.
But you can call List.set, so it's still mutable.

You can make Arrays.asList even shorter with a static import:

List<String> strings = asList("foo", "bar", "baz");

The static import:

import static java.util.Arrays.asList;  

Which any modern IDE will suggest and automatically do for you.
For example in IntelliJ IDEA you press Alt+Enter and select Static import method....

However, i don't recommend shortening the List.of method to of, because that becomes confusing.
List.of is already short enough and reads well.

Using Streams

Why does it have to be a List?
With Java 8 or later you can use a Stream which is more flexible:

Stream<String> strings = Stream.of("foo", "bar", "baz");

You can concatenate Streams:

Stream<String> strings = Stream.concat(Stream.of("foo", "bar"),
                                       Stream.of("baz", "qux"));

Or you can go from a Stream to a List:

import static;

List<String> strings = Stream.of("foo", "bar", "baz").collect(toList());

But preferably, just use the Stream without collecting it to a List.

If you really specifically need a java.util.ArrayList

(You probably don't.)
To quote JEP 269 (emphasis mine):

There is a small set of use cases for initializing a mutable collection instance with a predefined set of values. It's usually preferable to have those predefined values be in an immutable collection, and then to initialize the mutable collection via a copy constructor.

If you want to both prepopulate an ArrayList and add to it afterwards (why?), use

ArrayList<String> strings = new ArrayList<>(List.of("foo", "bar"));

or in Java 8 or earlier:

ArrayList<String> strings = new ArrayList<>(asList("foo", "bar"));

or using Stream:

import static;

ArrayList<String> strings = Stream.of("foo", "bar")

But again, it's better to just use the Stream directly instead of collecting it to a List.

Program to interfaces, not to implementations

You said you've declared the list as an ArrayList in your code, but you should only do that if you're using some member of ArrayList that's not in List.

Which you are most likely not doing.

Usually you should just declare variables by the most general interface that you are going to use (e.g. Iterable, Collection, or List), and initialize them with the specific implementation (e.g. ArrayList, LinkedList or Arrays.asList()).

Otherwise you're limiting your code to that specific type, and it'll be harder to change when you want to.

For example, if you're passing an ArrayList to a void method(...):

// Iterable if you just need iteration, for (String s : strings):
void method(Iterable<String> strings) { 
    for (String s : strings) { ... } 

// Collection if you also need .size(), .isEmpty(), or .stream():
void method(Collection<String> strings) {
    if (!strings.isEmpty()) { }

// List if you also need .get(index):
void method(List<String> strings) {

// Don't declare a specific list implementation
// unless you're sure you need it:
void method(ArrayList<String> strings) {
    ??? // You don't want to limit yourself to just ArrayList

Another example would be always declaring variable an InputStream even though it is usually a FileInputStream or a BufferedInputStream, because one day soon you or somebody else will want to use some other kind of InputStream.

If you need a simple list of size 1:

List<String> strings = new ArrayList<String>(Collections.singletonList("A"));

If you need a list of several objects:

List<String> strings = new ArrayList<String>();

With Guava you can write:

ArrayList<String> places = Lists.newArrayList("Buenos Aires", "Córdoba", "La Plata");

In Guava there are also other useful static constructors. You can read about them here.


With and above, as suggested in JEP 269: Convenience Factory Methods for Collections, this could be achieved using collection literals now with -

List<String> list = List.of("A", "B", "C");

Set<String> set = Set.of("A", "B", "C");

A similar approach would apply to Map as well -

Map<String, String> map = Map.of("k1", "v1", "k2", "v2", "k3", "v3")

which is similar to Collection Literals proposal as stated by @coobird. Further clarified in the JEP as well -


Language changes have been considered several times, and rejected:

Project Coin Proposal, 29 March 2009

Project Coin Proposal, 30 March 2009

JEP 186 discussion on lambda-dev, January-March 2014

The language proposals were set aside in preference to a library-based proposal as summarized in this message.

Related: What is the point of overloaded Convenience Factory Methods for Collections in Java 9


Collection literals didn't make it into Java 8, but it is possible to use the Stream API to initialize a list in one rather long line:

List<String> places = Stream.of("Buenos Aires", "Córdoba", "La Plata").collect(Collectors.toList());

If you need to ensure that your List is an ArrayList:

ArrayList<String> places = Stream.of("Buenos Aires", "Córdoba", "La Plata").collect(Collectors.toCollection(ArrayList::new));

Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with: Stack Overflow
Email: [email protected]